When an NFL captain wins the coin toss, they face an immediate choice: take the ball and put your offense on the field, or decline — deferring first possession to your opponent and guaranteeing your team gets the ball to start the second half. For most of football history, teams received. Then something changed.
The data below shows one of the clearest strategic shifts in modern NFL history — a near-complete reversal in how teams use the coin toss, driven by analytics, coaching trends, and an evolving understanding of when possession is most valuable.
Why Teams Defer — and Why It Took So Long to Catch On
Deferring means giving up first possession but locking in possession at the start of the second half — the most strategically valuable point in the game. The team that receives the second-half kickoff gets to respond to halftime adjustments with the ball, and in close games, having the ball with two minutes left in regulation often matters more than first possession at 0–0.
The argument for receiving has always been: score first, set the tone, force the other team to play from behind. That logic made sense in an era when scoring drives were harder to come by. As NFL offenses became more efficient through the 2010s — and as analytics-driven coaching staffs started quantifying the marginal value of possession — the calculus shifted. The tipping point came around 2013, the first season in this dataset where a majority of toss winners leaguewide chose to defer (58%).
By 2025, receiving the ball is almost contrarian. The teams still doing it reliably are outliers — worth examining, because they're either philosophically committed to it or simply haven't fully embraced the consensus.
Teams That Defer the Most (All-Time)
These franchises defer at rates well above the historical league average of 71%. Some were early adopters; others shifted more recently.
| Rank | Team | Defer % | Defers / Wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Las Vegas Raiders | 90% | 52/58 |
| 2 | Los Angeles Rams | 88% | 98/111 |
| 3 | Buffalo Bills | 87% | 152/175 |
| 4 | Seattle Seahawks | 86% | 146/170 |
| 5 | New England Patriots | 86% | 142/166 |
| 6 | San Francisco 49ers | 84% | 135/161 |
| 7 | Cincinnati Bengals | 84% | 130/155 |
| 8 | Baltimore Ravens | 83% | 140/168 |
| 9 | Kansas City Chiefs | 82% | 148/180 |
| 10 | New York Jets | 78% | 124/158 |
Teams That Receive the Most (All-Time)
These teams bucked the league trend — consistently choosing to receive. Whether by philosophy, habit, or personnel, they've diverged from the modern consensus.
| Rank | Team | Defer % | Defers / Wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dallas Cowboys | 43% | 66/154 |
| 2 | Atlanta Falcons | 50% | 82/163 |
| 3 | Arizona Cardinals | 53% | 87/165 |
| 4 | Detroit Lions | 56% | 90/160 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 56% | 100/178 |
| 6 | New Orleans Saints | 59% | 90/152 |
| 7 | Indianapolis Colts | 61% | 94/155 |
| 8 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 61% | 95/156 |
| 9 | New York Giants | 63% | 105/167 |
| 10 | Houston Texans | 64% | 99/155 |
League-Wide Defer Rate by Season (2010–2025)
Watch the number climb. The shift from a minority behavior to a near-universal one happened gradually then rapidly — a textbook adoption curve.
| Season | League Defer Rate | Tosses |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72% | 334 |
| 2024 | 78% | 334 |
| 2023 | 83% | 334 |
| 2022 | 87% | 333 |
| 2021 | 86% | 333 |
| 2020 | 91% | 269 |
| 2019 | 79% | 332 |
| 2018 | 89% | 332 |
| 2017 | 77% | 331 |
| 2016 | 75% | 331 |
| 2015 | 76% | 332 |
| 2014 | 62% | 332 |
| 2013 | 58% | 332 |
| 2012 | 47% | 332 |
| 2011 | 37% | 331 |
| 2010 | 28% | 332 |
Every team page shows that franchise's individual defer rate alongside the league average, with season-by-season breakdowns. See where your team stands:
Team analytics →


















